Review



murine igf1  (MedChemExpress)


Bioz Verified Symbol MedChemExpress is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol MedChemExpress manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    MedChemExpress murine igf1
    Analysis of scRNA‐seq data to identify dermal mesenchymal cell population that co‐expresses Egfr and <t>Igf1</t> in neonatal murine skin. (A) UMAP visualisation of all cell populations in 2‐day‐old neonatal mouse skin. Each point represents a single cell, colour‐coded based on cell types. (B) Subset and clustering of dermal cells. (C) Visualisation of dermal and epithelial marker gene expression across dermal subtypes shown in the dot plot. (D) Vlnplot showing Egfr and Igf1 expression in dermal subclusters. (E) Heatmap of top 50 differently expressed genes in EGFR − cells, EGFR + cells and dermal papilla (DP) cells. (F) The GO terms of the BP, CC, and MF categories enrichment of the upregulated genes in EGFR + cells. Within Cartesian coordinates (x,y), the closer the different circles are, the more related the GO terms are. The size of the circle is proportional to the number of genes within the GO terms. The colour of the circle indicates the significance enrichment. BP, biological process; CC, cellular component; GO, Gene Ontology; MF, molecular function.
    Murine Igf1, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 14 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/murine igf1/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 93 stars, based on 14 article reviews
    murine igf1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "EGFR marks a subpopulation of dermal mesenchymal cells highly expressing IGF1 which enhances hair follicle regeneration"

    Article Title: EGFR marks a subpopulation of dermal mesenchymal cells highly expressing IGF1 which enhances hair follicle regeneration

    Journal: Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine

    doi: 10.1111/jcmm.17766

    Analysis of scRNA‐seq data to identify dermal mesenchymal cell population that co‐expresses Egfr and Igf1 in neonatal murine skin. (A) UMAP visualisation of all cell populations in 2‐day‐old neonatal mouse skin. Each point represents a single cell, colour‐coded based on cell types. (B) Subset and clustering of dermal cells. (C) Visualisation of dermal and epithelial marker gene expression across dermal subtypes shown in the dot plot. (D) Vlnplot showing Egfr and Igf1 expression in dermal subclusters. (E) Heatmap of top 50 differently expressed genes in EGFR − cells, EGFR + cells and dermal papilla (DP) cells. (F) The GO terms of the BP, CC, and MF categories enrichment of the upregulated genes in EGFR + cells. Within Cartesian coordinates (x,y), the closer the different circles are, the more related the GO terms are. The size of the circle is proportional to the number of genes within the GO terms. The colour of the circle indicates the significance enrichment. BP, biological process; CC, cellular component; GO, Gene Ontology; MF, molecular function.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Analysis of scRNA‐seq data to identify dermal mesenchymal cell population that co‐expresses Egfr and Igf1 in neonatal murine skin. (A) UMAP visualisation of all cell populations in 2‐day‐old neonatal mouse skin. Each point represents a single cell, colour‐coded based on cell types. (B) Subset and clustering of dermal cells. (C) Visualisation of dermal and epithelial marker gene expression across dermal subtypes shown in the dot plot. (D) Vlnplot showing Egfr and Igf1 expression in dermal subclusters. (E) Heatmap of top 50 differently expressed genes in EGFR − cells, EGFR + cells and dermal papilla (DP) cells. (F) The GO terms of the BP, CC, and MF categories enrichment of the upregulated genes in EGFR + cells. Within Cartesian coordinates (x,y), the closer the different circles are, the more related the GO terms are. The size of the circle is proportional to the number of genes within the GO terms. The colour of the circle indicates the significance enrichment. BP, biological process; CC, cellular component; GO, Gene Ontology; MF, molecular function.

    Techniques Used: Marker, Expressing

    Isolation of EGFR expressing mesenchymal cells present in neonatal murine dermis. (A) Immunofluorescence staining for EGFR in tetracycline‐induced neonatal skin from Krt14‐rtTA‐H2BGFP. Scale bar: 50 μm. White arrows point to EGFR positive non‐epithelial cells. (B) Schematic illustration of our strategy for analysing and sorting of EGFR‐expressing mesenchymal cells in neonatal dermis. (C) Fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS) of EGFR+ cells in compo‐site‐FITC negative cells. APC, allophycocyanin; GFP, green fluorescent protein. (D) Real‐Time PCR analysis of mesenchymal marker (Col1a1) expression in freshly isolated mouse dermal subpopulations (Data represents mean ± SEM, n = 3). (E) Immunofluorescence staining of EGFR, vimentin (VIM), DAPI. Scale bar, 100 μm. (F) Real‐time PCR analysis of Igf1 expression in the freshly isolated mouse dermal subpopulations. In Real‐time PCR experiments (D and F), we used triple wells for each sample. Samples from two independent experiments were examined and showed similar results. Results of one analysis are shown. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; EGFR‐ and EGFR+, represent EGFR negative and positive cells; Epi, epidermal cells; ns, means no significant difference.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Isolation of EGFR expressing mesenchymal cells present in neonatal murine dermis. (A) Immunofluorescence staining for EGFR in tetracycline‐induced neonatal skin from Krt14‐rtTA‐H2BGFP. Scale bar: 50 μm. White arrows point to EGFR positive non‐epithelial cells. (B) Schematic illustration of our strategy for analysing and sorting of EGFR‐expressing mesenchymal cells in neonatal dermis. (C) Fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS) of EGFR+ cells in compo‐site‐FITC negative cells. APC, allophycocyanin; GFP, green fluorescent protein. (D) Real‐Time PCR analysis of mesenchymal marker (Col1a1) expression in freshly isolated mouse dermal subpopulations (Data represents mean ± SEM, n = 3). (E) Immunofluorescence staining of EGFR, vimentin (VIM), DAPI. Scale bar, 100 μm. (F) Real‐time PCR analysis of Igf1 expression in the freshly isolated mouse dermal subpopulations. In Real‐time PCR experiments (D and F), we used triple wells for each sample. Samples from two independent experiments were examined and showed similar results. Results of one analysis are shown. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; EGFR‐ and EGFR+, represent EGFR negative and positive cells; Epi, epidermal cells; ns, means no significant difference.

    Techniques Used: Isolation, Expressing, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Fluorescence, FACS, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Marker

    EGFR and IGF1 expression in adult murine dermis. (A) Immunofluorescence staining for EGFR and DAPI in skin tissues of 7‐week‐old PDGFRa cre ERT;mTmG mice . Scale bar, 100 μm. (B) Immunofluorescence staining of EGFR in tetracycline‐induced Krt14‐rtTA‐H2BGFP adult mouse skin. White arrows point to EGFR positive non‐epithelial cells. Scale bars, 100 μm (C) Immunofluorescence staining of IGF1 in Day 7 wounds. Scale bars, 200 μm. (D) Co‐localisation of IGF1 and EGFR in adult wound dermis. White arrows point to EGFR positive cells. Scale bars, 100 μm.
    Figure Legend Snippet: EGFR and IGF1 expression in adult murine dermis. (A) Immunofluorescence staining for EGFR and DAPI in skin tissues of 7‐week‐old PDGFRa cre ERT;mTmG mice . Scale bar, 100 μm. (B) Immunofluorescence staining of EGFR in tetracycline‐induced Krt14‐rtTA‐H2BGFP adult mouse skin. White arrows point to EGFR positive non‐epithelial cells. Scale bars, 100 μm (C) Immunofluorescence staining of IGF1 in Day 7 wounds. Scale bars, 200 μm. (D) Co‐localisation of IGF1 and EGFR in adult wound dermis. White arrows point to EGFR positive cells. Scale bars, 100 μm.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Immunofluorescence, Staining

    Effects of IGF1 on wound‐induced hair follicle neogenesis. (A) Schematic representation of strategy for exogenous IGF1 injection during wound healing process. Two full thickness wound (diameter = 2 mm) were made on neonatal mouse dorsal skin. From post‐wounding Day 7 to Day 14, each mouse received a daily injection of 50 μL PBS or murine IGF1 solution (dissolved in PBS at 1 ng/μl) beneath the scab into the wound bed tissue in the two dorsal wounds, respectively. (B) AP staining on wound tissue from control group (PBS) and IGF1 injection group collected at post wound Day 15. The wound bed lies between red dash lines in each picture. AP was stained blue. Red arrows point to AP positive area including neogenic hair follicles. Scale bar, 200 μm. (C) Visualisation of hair follicles in healed wounds collected at Day 21. (D) Statistics of hair follicles in both groups collected at Day 21. Data represents the mean ± SEM, n = 4, * p < 0.05.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Effects of IGF1 on wound‐induced hair follicle neogenesis. (A) Schematic representation of strategy for exogenous IGF1 injection during wound healing process. Two full thickness wound (diameter = 2 mm) were made on neonatal mouse dorsal skin. From post‐wounding Day 7 to Day 14, each mouse received a daily injection of 50 μL PBS or murine IGF1 solution (dissolved in PBS at 1 ng/μl) beneath the scab into the wound bed tissue in the two dorsal wounds, respectively. (B) AP staining on wound tissue from control group (PBS) and IGF1 injection group collected at post wound Day 15. The wound bed lies between red dash lines in each picture. AP was stained blue. Red arrows point to AP positive area including neogenic hair follicles. Scale bar, 200 μm. (C) Visualisation of hair follicles in healed wounds collected at Day 21. (D) Statistics of hair follicles in both groups collected at Day 21. Data represents the mean ± SEM, n = 4, * p < 0.05.

    Techniques Used: Injection, Staining, Control



    Similar Products

    93
    Gold Biotechnology Inc human recombinant
    Human Recombinant, supplied by Gold Biotechnology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human recombinant/product/Gold Biotechnology Inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human recombinant - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    MedChemExpress murine igf1
    Analysis of scRNA‐seq data to identify dermal mesenchymal cell population that co‐expresses Egfr and <t>Igf1</t> in neonatal murine skin. (A) UMAP visualisation of all cell populations in 2‐day‐old neonatal mouse skin. Each point represents a single cell, colour‐coded based on cell types. (B) Subset and clustering of dermal cells. (C) Visualisation of dermal and epithelial marker gene expression across dermal subtypes shown in the dot plot. (D) Vlnplot showing Egfr and Igf1 expression in dermal subclusters. (E) Heatmap of top 50 differently expressed genes in EGFR − cells, EGFR + cells and dermal papilla (DP) cells. (F) The GO terms of the BP, CC, and MF categories enrichment of the upregulated genes in EGFR + cells. Within Cartesian coordinates (x,y), the closer the different circles are, the more related the GO terms are. The size of the circle is proportional to the number of genes within the GO terms. The colour of the circle indicates the significance enrichment. BP, biological process; CC, cellular component; GO, Gene Ontology; MF, molecular function.
    Murine Igf1, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/murine igf1/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    murine igf1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    PeproTech recombinant murine igf1
    ( A ) IF analysis of SMA in the alveoli of Hhip -deleted (HHIP CKO) and control mice at P14. ( B ) Number of myofibroblasts per unit alveolar area of Hhip -deleted and control mice. ( C and D ) UMAP showing cell clusters in the lung fibroblasts of Hhip -deleted and control mice at P14. ( E ) Violin plots showing the expression of Pdgfra , Acta2 , Hhip , and Cdh4 in alveolar myofibroblasts (ALMF), ductal myofibroblasts (DMF), peribronchial fibroblasts (Perib), adventitial fibroblasts (Adv), and alveolar fibroblasts (Alv). ( F ) Expression of Acta2 , Myh11 , Tagln , and <t>Igf1</t> in ALMFs and DMFs of Hhip -deleted and control mice. ( G ) qPCR analysis of Igf1 expression in the lung stromal cells isolated from Hhip -deleted and control mice. ( H ) Analysis of Igf1 (RNA in situ ) and SMA expression in the alveoli. ( I ) Number of SMA + Igf1 + cells per unit alveolar area of Hhip -deleted and control mice at P14. ( J ) Percentage of SMA + Igf1 + cells in total Igf1 + cells. ( K ) Top 10 activated pathways in Hhip -deleted, relative to control myofibroblasts, analyzed with IPA. ( L ) qPCR analysis of Gli1 , Igf1 , and Acta2 expression in the lung stromal cells treated with PBS, SHH, and SHH plus HHIP. ( M ) qPCR analysis of Acta2 expression in SHH-stimulated lung stromal cells treated with vehicle or IGF1R inhibitor. ( N ) IF analysis of SMA expression in the alveoli of Hhip -deleted mice administered with vehicle or IGF1R inhibitor. ( O ) Number of myofibroblasts per unit alveolar area of Hhip -deleted mice administered with vehicle or IGF1R inhibitor. All in vitro experiments have been repeated at least one time with consistent results for validation. Each data point represents one mouse [(B), (G), (I), (J), and (O)] of an individual experiment. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.005, *** P < 0.0005, and **** P < 0.0001.
    Recombinant Murine Igf1, supplied by PeproTech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant murine igf1/product/PeproTech
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant murine igf1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    PeproTech murine igf1 250–19
    FT stromal cells serve as a niche for FTE cells (A) Representative pictures from organoid culture of sorted Lin − CD24 + cells (4,000, enriched with FTE cells), or Lin − CD24 − cells (5,000, enriched with FT stromal cells), or Lin − CD24 + cells (4,000) plus Lin − CD24 − cells (5,000) (co-culture), scale bar = 100 μm. (B) Quantification of sizes of organoids for (A); ∗∗∗∗: p ≤ 0.0001. (C) Quantification of numbers of organoids (at different size ranges) formed from different cultures as in (A). Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent experiments; ∗∗: p ≤ 0.01, ∗: p ≤ 0.05, ns: not significant. (D) Representative pictures from organoid culture of sorted Lin − CD24 + cells (4,000) in the BT medium in the absence (control) or presence of <t>IGF1,</t> scale bar = 100 μm. (E) Quantification of sizes of organoids for (D); ∗∗∗∗: p ≤ 0.0001. (F) Representative pictures from organoid co-culture in the presence (or absence, or DMSO vehicle control) of different concentrations of the IGF1R inhibitor, PPP, scale bar = 100 μm. (G) Quantification of sizes of organoids for (F); ∗∗: p ≤ 0.01, ∗: p ≤ 0.05, ns: not significant. (H and I) Quantification of sizes and numbers of organoids at different passages of the long-term culture, started from either established organoids (i.e., established via serial passages in the BET medium) (H) or P0 organoid co-culture (i.e., FTE cells + stromal cells from fresh FT tissues) (I), under either the BET, or BT, or BT + IGF1 medium. During each passage, organoids in the BET or BT + IGF1 medium were split at a 1:2 ratio; under the BT medium, because of the small cell number, all recovered single cells were passaged to the next round (1:1). Organoid cells were allowed to grow for 7 days and were then passaged. ∗∗∗: p ≤ 0.001, ∗: p ≤ 0.05, ns: not significant. See also <xref ref-type=Figure S5 . " width="250" height="auto" />
    Murine Igf1 250–19, supplied by PeproTech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/murine igf1 250–19/product/PeproTech
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    murine igf1 250–19 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Gold Biotechnology Inc igf 1
    FT stromal cells serve as a niche for FTE cells (A) Representative pictures from organoid culture of sorted Lin − CD24 + cells (4,000, enriched with FTE cells), or Lin − CD24 − cells (5,000, enriched with FT stromal cells), or Lin − CD24 + cells (4,000) plus Lin − CD24 − cells (5,000) (co-culture), scale bar = 100 μm. (B) Quantification of sizes of organoids for (A); ∗∗∗∗: p ≤ 0.0001. (C) Quantification of numbers of organoids (at different size ranges) formed from different cultures as in (A). Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent experiments; ∗∗: p ≤ 0.01, ∗: p ≤ 0.05, ns: not significant. (D) Representative pictures from organoid culture of sorted Lin − CD24 + cells (4,000) in the BT medium in the absence (control) or presence of <t>IGF1,</t> scale bar = 100 μm. (E) Quantification of sizes of organoids for (D); ∗∗∗∗: p ≤ 0.0001. (F) Representative pictures from organoid co-culture in the presence (or absence, or DMSO vehicle control) of different concentrations of the IGF1R inhibitor, PPP, scale bar = 100 μm. (G) Quantification of sizes of organoids for (F); ∗∗: p ≤ 0.01, ∗: p ≤ 0.05, ns: not significant. (H and I) Quantification of sizes and numbers of organoids at different passages of the long-term culture, started from either established organoids (i.e., established via serial passages in the BET medium) (H) or P0 organoid co-culture (i.e., FTE cells + stromal cells from fresh FT tissues) (I), under either the BET, or BT, or BT + IGF1 medium. During each passage, organoids in the BET or BT + IGF1 medium were split at a 1:2 ratio; under the BT medium, because of the small cell number, all recovered single cells were passaged to the next round (1:1). Organoid cells were allowed to grow for 7 days and were then passaged. ∗∗∗: p ≤ 0.001, ∗: p ≤ 0.05, ns: not significant. See also <xref ref-type=Figure S5 . " width="250" height="auto" />
    Igf 1, supplied by Gold Biotechnology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/igf 1/product/Gold Biotechnology Inc
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    igf 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    PeproTech recombinant murine igf1 250-19
    FT stromal cells serve as a niche for FTE cells (A) Representative pictures from organoid culture of sorted Lin − CD24 + cells (4,000, enriched with FTE cells), or Lin − CD24 − cells (5,000, enriched with FT stromal cells), or Lin − CD24 + cells (4,000) plus Lin − CD24 − cells (5,000) (co-culture), scale bar = 100 μm. (B) Quantification of sizes of organoids for (A); ∗∗∗∗: p ≤ 0.0001. (C) Quantification of numbers of organoids (at different size ranges) formed from different cultures as in (A). Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent experiments; ∗∗: p ≤ 0.01, ∗: p ≤ 0.05, ns: not significant. (D) Representative pictures from organoid culture of sorted Lin − CD24 + cells (4,000) in the BT medium in the absence (control) or presence of <t>IGF1,</t> scale bar = 100 μm. (E) Quantification of sizes of organoids for (D); ∗∗∗∗: p ≤ 0.0001. (F) Representative pictures from organoid co-culture in the presence (or absence, or DMSO vehicle control) of different concentrations of the IGF1R inhibitor, PPP, scale bar = 100 μm. (G) Quantification of sizes of organoids for (F); ∗∗: p ≤ 0.01, ∗: p ≤ 0.05, ns: not significant. (H and I) Quantification of sizes and numbers of organoids at different passages of the long-term culture, started from either established organoids (i.e., established via serial passages in the BET medium) (H) or P0 organoid co-culture (i.e., FTE cells + stromal cells from fresh FT tissues) (I), under either the BET, or BT, or BT + IGF1 medium. During each passage, organoids in the BET or BT + IGF1 medium were split at a 1:2 ratio; under the BT medium, because of the small cell number, all recovered single cells were passaged to the next round (1:1). Organoid cells were allowed to grow for 7 days and were then passaged. ∗∗∗: p ≤ 0.001, ∗: p ≤ 0.05, ns: not significant. See also <xref ref-type=Figure S5 . " width="250" height="auto" />
    Recombinant Murine Igf1 250 19, supplied by PeproTech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant murine igf1 250-19/product/PeproTech
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant murine igf1 250-19 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Analysis of scRNA‐seq data to identify dermal mesenchymal cell population that co‐expresses Egfr and Igf1 in neonatal murine skin. (A) UMAP visualisation of all cell populations in 2‐day‐old neonatal mouse skin. Each point represents a single cell, colour‐coded based on cell types. (B) Subset and clustering of dermal cells. (C) Visualisation of dermal and epithelial marker gene expression across dermal subtypes shown in the dot plot. (D) Vlnplot showing Egfr and Igf1 expression in dermal subclusters. (E) Heatmap of top 50 differently expressed genes in EGFR − cells, EGFR + cells and dermal papilla (DP) cells. (F) The GO terms of the BP, CC, and MF categories enrichment of the upregulated genes in EGFR + cells. Within Cartesian coordinates (x,y), the closer the different circles are, the more related the GO terms are. The size of the circle is proportional to the number of genes within the GO terms. The colour of the circle indicates the significance enrichment. BP, biological process; CC, cellular component; GO, Gene Ontology; MF, molecular function.

    Journal: Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine

    Article Title: EGFR marks a subpopulation of dermal mesenchymal cells highly expressing IGF1 which enhances hair follicle regeneration

    doi: 10.1111/jcmm.17766

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Analysis of scRNA‐seq data to identify dermal mesenchymal cell population that co‐expresses Egfr and Igf1 in neonatal murine skin. (A) UMAP visualisation of all cell populations in 2‐day‐old neonatal mouse skin. Each point represents a single cell, colour‐coded based on cell types. (B) Subset and clustering of dermal cells. (C) Visualisation of dermal and epithelial marker gene expression across dermal subtypes shown in the dot plot. (D) Vlnplot showing Egfr and Igf1 expression in dermal subclusters. (E) Heatmap of top 50 differently expressed genes in EGFR − cells, EGFR + cells and dermal papilla (DP) cells. (F) The GO terms of the BP, CC, and MF categories enrichment of the upregulated genes in EGFR + cells. Within Cartesian coordinates (x,y), the closer the different circles are, the more related the GO terms are. The size of the circle is proportional to the number of genes within the GO terms. The colour of the circle indicates the significance enrichment. BP, biological process; CC, cellular component; GO, Gene Ontology; MF, molecular function.

    Article Snippet: From post‐injury Day 7 to Day 14, each mouse received a daily injection of 50 μL PBS or murine IGF1 (MCE, HY‐P7070) solution (dissolved in PBS at 1 ng/μl) in the two wounds, respectively (beneath the scab into the wound bed tissue).

    Techniques: Marker, Expressing

    Isolation of EGFR expressing mesenchymal cells present in neonatal murine dermis. (A) Immunofluorescence staining for EGFR in tetracycline‐induced neonatal skin from Krt14‐rtTA‐H2BGFP. Scale bar: 50 μm. White arrows point to EGFR positive non‐epithelial cells. (B) Schematic illustration of our strategy for analysing and sorting of EGFR‐expressing mesenchymal cells in neonatal dermis. (C) Fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS) of EGFR+ cells in compo‐site‐FITC negative cells. APC, allophycocyanin; GFP, green fluorescent protein. (D) Real‐Time PCR analysis of mesenchymal marker (Col1a1) expression in freshly isolated mouse dermal subpopulations (Data represents mean ± SEM, n = 3). (E) Immunofluorescence staining of EGFR, vimentin (VIM), DAPI. Scale bar, 100 μm. (F) Real‐time PCR analysis of Igf1 expression in the freshly isolated mouse dermal subpopulations. In Real‐time PCR experiments (D and F), we used triple wells for each sample. Samples from two independent experiments were examined and showed similar results. Results of one analysis are shown. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; EGFR‐ and EGFR+, represent EGFR negative and positive cells; Epi, epidermal cells; ns, means no significant difference.

    Journal: Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine

    Article Title: EGFR marks a subpopulation of dermal mesenchymal cells highly expressing IGF1 which enhances hair follicle regeneration

    doi: 10.1111/jcmm.17766

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Isolation of EGFR expressing mesenchymal cells present in neonatal murine dermis. (A) Immunofluorescence staining for EGFR in tetracycline‐induced neonatal skin from Krt14‐rtTA‐H2BGFP. Scale bar: 50 μm. White arrows point to EGFR positive non‐epithelial cells. (B) Schematic illustration of our strategy for analysing and sorting of EGFR‐expressing mesenchymal cells in neonatal dermis. (C) Fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS) of EGFR+ cells in compo‐site‐FITC negative cells. APC, allophycocyanin; GFP, green fluorescent protein. (D) Real‐Time PCR analysis of mesenchymal marker (Col1a1) expression in freshly isolated mouse dermal subpopulations (Data represents mean ± SEM, n = 3). (E) Immunofluorescence staining of EGFR, vimentin (VIM), DAPI. Scale bar, 100 μm. (F) Real‐time PCR analysis of Igf1 expression in the freshly isolated mouse dermal subpopulations. In Real‐time PCR experiments (D and F), we used triple wells for each sample. Samples from two independent experiments were examined and showed similar results. Results of one analysis are shown. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; EGFR‐ and EGFR+, represent EGFR negative and positive cells; Epi, epidermal cells; ns, means no significant difference.

    Article Snippet: From post‐injury Day 7 to Day 14, each mouse received a daily injection of 50 μL PBS or murine IGF1 (MCE, HY‐P7070) solution (dissolved in PBS at 1 ng/μl) in the two wounds, respectively (beneath the scab into the wound bed tissue).

    Techniques: Isolation, Expressing, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Fluorescence, FACS, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Marker

    EGFR and IGF1 expression in adult murine dermis. (A) Immunofluorescence staining for EGFR and DAPI in skin tissues of 7‐week‐old PDGFRa cre ERT;mTmG mice . Scale bar, 100 μm. (B) Immunofluorescence staining of EGFR in tetracycline‐induced Krt14‐rtTA‐H2BGFP adult mouse skin. White arrows point to EGFR positive non‐epithelial cells. Scale bars, 100 μm (C) Immunofluorescence staining of IGF1 in Day 7 wounds. Scale bars, 200 μm. (D) Co‐localisation of IGF1 and EGFR in adult wound dermis. White arrows point to EGFR positive cells. Scale bars, 100 μm.

    Journal: Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine

    Article Title: EGFR marks a subpopulation of dermal mesenchymal cells highly expressing IGF1 which enhances hair follicle regeneration

    doi: 10.1111/jcmm.17766

    Figure Lengend Snippet: EGFR and IGF1 expression in adult murine dermis. (A) Immunofluorescence staining for EGFR and DAPI in skin tissues of 7‐week‐old PDGFRa cre ERT;mTmG mice . Scale bar, 100 μm. (B) Immunofluorescence staining of EGFR in tetracycline‐induced Krt14‐rtTA‐H2BGFP adult mouse skin. White arrows point to EGFR positive non‐epithelial cells. Scale bars, 100 μm (C) Immunofluorescence staining of IGF1 in Day 7 wounds. Scale bars, 200 μm. (D) Co‐localisation of IGF1 and EGFR in adult wound dermis. White arrows point to EGFR positive cells. Scale bars, 100 μm.

    Article Snippet: From post‐injury Day 7 to Day 14, each mouse received a daily injection of 50 μL PBS or murine IGF1 (MCE, HY‐P7070) solution (dissolved in PBS at 1 ng/μl) in the two wounds, respectively (beneath the scab into the wound bed tissue).

    Techniques: Expressing, Immunofluorescence, Staining

    Effects of IGF1 on wound‐induced hair follicle neogenesis. (A) Schematic representation of strategy for exogenous IGF1 injection during wound healing process. Two full thickness wound (diameter = 2 mm) were made on neonatal mouse dorsal skin. From post‐wounding Day 7 to Day 14, each mouse received a daily injection of 50 μL PBS or murine IGF1 solution (dissolved in PBS at 1 ng/μl) beneath the scab into the wound bed tissue in the two dorsal wounds, respectively. (B) AP staining on wound tissue from control group (PBS) and IGF1 injection group collected at post wound Day 15. The wound bed lies between red dash lines in each picture. AP was stained blue. Red arrows point to AP positive area including neogenic hair follicles. Scale bar, 200 μm. (C) Visualisation of hair follicles in healed wounds collected at Day 21. (D) Statistics of hair follicles in both groups collected at Day 21. Data represents the mean ± SEM, n = 4, * p < 0.05.

    Journal: Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine

    Article Title: EGFR marks a subpopulation of dermal mesenchymal cells highly expressing IGF1 which enhances hair follicle regeneration

    doi: 10.1111/jcmm.17766

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Effects of IGF1 on wound‐induced hair follicle neogenesis. (A) Schematic representation of strategy for exogenous IGF1 injection during wound healing process. Two full thickness wound (diameter = 2 mm) were made on neonatal mouse dorsal skin. From post‐wounding Day 7 to Day 14, each mouse received a daily injection of 50 μL PBS or murine IGF1 solution (dissolved in PBS at 1 ng/μl) beneath the scab into the wound bed tissue in the two dorsal wounds, respectively. (B) AP staining on wound tissue from control group (PBS) and IGF1 injection group collected at post wound Day 15. The wound bed lies between red dash lines in each picture. AP was stained blue. Red arrows point to AP positive area including neogenic hair follicles. Scale bar, 200 μm. (C) Visualisation of hair follicles in healed wounds collected at Day 21. (D) Statistics of hair follicles in both groups collected at Day 21. Data represents the mean ± SEM, n = 4, * p < 0.05.

    Article Snippet: From post‐injury Day 7 to Day 14, each mouse received a daily injection of 50 μL PBS or murine IGF1 (MCE, HY‐P7070) solution (dissolved in PBS at 1 ng/μl) in the two wounds, respectively (beneath the scab into the wound bed tissue).

    Techniques: Injection, Staining, Control

    ( A ) IF analysis of SMA in the alveoli of Hhip -deleted (HHIP CKO) and control mice at P14. ( B ) Number of myofibroblasts per unit alveolar area of Hhip -deleted and control mice. ( C and D ) UMAP showing cell clusters in the lung fibroblasts of Hhip -deleted and control mice at P14. ( E ) Violin plots showing the expression of Pdgfra , Acta2 , Hhip , and Cdh4 in alveolar myofibroblasts (ALMF), ductal myofibroblasts (DMF), peribronchial fibroblasts (Perib), adventitial fibroblasts (Adv), and alveolar fibroblasts (Alv). ( F ) Expression of Acta2 , Myh11 , Tagln , and Igf1 in ALMFs and DMFs of Hhip -deleted and control mice. ( G ) qPCR analysis of Igf1 expression in the lung stromal cells isolated from Hhip -deleted and control mice. ( H ) Analysis of Igf1 (RNA in situ ) and SMA expression in the alveoli. ( I ) Number of SMA + Igf1 + cells per unit alveolar area of Hhip -deleted and control mice at P14. ( J ) Percentage of SMA + Igf1 + cells in total Igf1 + cells. ( K ) Top 10 activated pathways in Hhip -deleted, relative to control myofibroblasts, analyzed with IPA. ( L ) qPCR analysis of Gli1 , Igf1 , and Acta2 expression in the lung stromal cells treated with PBS, SHH, and SHH plus HHIP. ( M ) qPCR analysis of Acta2 expression in SHH-stimulated lung stromal cells treated with vehicle or IGF1R inhibitor. ( N ) IF analysis of SMA expression in the alveoli of Hhip -deleted mice administered with vehicle or IGF1R inhibitor. ( O ) Number of myofibroblasts per unit alveolar area of Hhip -deleted mice administered with vehicle or IGF1R inhibitor. All in vitro experiments have been repeated at least one time with consistent results for validation. Each data point represents one mouse [(B), (G), (I), (J), and (O)] of an individual experiment. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.005, *** P < 0.0005, and **** P < 0.0001.

    Journal: Science Advances

    Article Title: Hedgehog-interacting protein orchestrates alveologenesis and protects against bronchopulmonary dysplasia and emphysema

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adu2958

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) IF analysis of SMA in the alveoli of Hhip -deleted (HHIP CKO) and control mice at P14. ( B ) Number of myofibroblasts per unit alveolar area of Hhip -deleted and control mice. ( C and D ) UMAP showing cell clusters in the lung fibroblasts of Hhip -deleted and control mice at P14. ( E ) Violin plots showing the expression of Pdgfra , Acta2 , Hhip , and Cdh4 in alveolar myofibroblasts (ALMF), ductal myofibroblasts (DMF), peribronchial fibroblasts (Perib), adventitial fibroblasts (Adv), and alveolar fibroblasts (Alv). ( F ) Expression of Acta2 , Myh11 , Tagln , and Igf1 in ALMFs and DMFs of Hhip -deleted and control mice. ( G ) qPCR analysis of Igf1 expression in the lung stromal cells isolated from Hhip -deleted and control mice. ( H ) Analysis of Igf1 (RNA in situ ) and SMA expression in the alveoli. ( I ) Number of SMA + Igf1 + cells per unit alveolar area of Hhip -deleted and control mice at P14. ( J ) Percentage of SMA + Igf1 + cells in total Igf1 + cells. ( K ) Top 10 activated pathways in Hhip -deleted, relative to control myofibroblasts, analyzed with IPA. ( L ) qPCR analysis of Gli1 , Igf1 , and Acta2 expression in the lung stromal cells treated with PBS, SHH, and SHH plus HHIP. ( M ) qPCR analysis of Acta2 expression in SHH-stimulated lung stromal cells treated with vehicle or IGF1R inhibitor. ( N ) IF analysis of SMA expression in the alveoli of Hhip -deleted mice administered with vehicle or IGF1R inhibitor. ( O ) Number of myofibroblasts per unit alveolar area of Hhip -deleted mice administered with vehicle or IGF1R inhibitor. All in vitro experiments have been repeated at least one time with consistent results for validation. Each data point represents one mouse [(B), (G), (I), (J), and (O)] of an individual experiment. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.005, *** P < 0.0005, and **** P < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: For IGF-1 treatment, the confluent fibroblasts were cultured in 0.5% FBS with 1% antibiotic-antimycotic, and recombinant murine IGF1 (catalog no. 250-19; PeproTech) was added at 50 ng/ml.

    Techniques: Control, Expressing, Isolation, In Situ, In Vitro, Biomarker Discovery

    ( A ) Violin plots showing the expression of Cdkn1a in ALMFs and DMFs of Hhip -deleted and control mice. ( B ) Senescence β-galactosidase staining of Hhip -deleted and control lungs. ( C ) IF analysis of SMA, p21, and CDH4 in Hhip -deleted and control lungs. Arrow: p21 + DMFs; arrowhead: p21 + ALMFs. ( D and E ) Number of p21 + ALMFs (D) and DMFs (E) per unit alveolar area of Hhip -deleted and control mice at P14. ( F ) IF analysis of SPC and p21 in Hhip -deleted and control lungs. Arrow: p21 + SPC + cells. ( G ) Percentage of p21 + cells in AT2s. ( H ) Activation of senescence pathways in the AT2s of Hhip -deleted mice, relative to control AT2s, and analyzed with IPA. ( I ) Top 5 upstream regulators in the AT2s of Hhip -deleted mice, relative to control AT2s, analyzed with IPA. ( J ) AT2 organoids cocultured with lung stromal cells ( R26R SmoM2/+ ) pre-infected with adenovirus-empty and adenovirus-Cre, treated with anti-IGF1 antibody and IgG. ( K and L ) Quantification of colony-forming efficiency (CFE) and organoid size. ( M ) IF analysis of SPC and p21 in AT2 organoids. Arrow: p21 + SPC + cells. ( N ) Percentage of p21 + cells in AT2s in the organoid assay. All in vitro experiments have been repeated at least one time with consistent results for validation. Each data point represents one mouse [(D), (E), and (G)] of an individual experiment. Data are expressed as Mean ± SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.005, *** P < 0.0005, and **** P < 0.0001.

    Journal: Science Advances

    Article Title: Hedgehog-interacting protein orchestrates alveologenesis and protects against bronchopulmonary dysplasia and emphysema

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adu2958

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Violin plots showing the expression of Cdkn1a in ALMFs and DMFs of Hhip -deleted and control mice. ( B ) Senescence β-galactosidase staining of Hhip -deleted and control lungs. ( C ) IF analysis of SMA, p21, and CDH4 in Hhip -deleted and control lungs. Arrow: p21 + DMFs; arrowhead: p21 + ALMFs. ( D and E ) Number of p21 + ALMFs (D) and DMFs (E) per unit alveolar area of Hhip -deleted and control mice at P14. ( F ) IF analysis of SPC and p21 in Hhip -deleted and control lungs. Arrow: p21 + SPC + cells. ( G ) Percentage of p21 + cells in AT2s. ( H ) Activation of senescence pathways in the AT2s of Hhip -deleted mice, relative to control AT2s, and analyzed with IPA. ( I ) Top 5 upstream regulators in the AT2s of Hhip -deleted mice, relative to control AT2s, analyzed with IPA. ( J ) AT2 organoids cocultured with lung stromal cells ( R26R SmoM2/+ ) pre-infected with adenovirus-empty and adenovirus-Cre, treated with anti-IGF1 antibody and IgG. ( K and L ) Quantification of colony-forming efficiency (CFE) and organoid size. ( M ) IF analysis of SPC and p21 in AT2 organoids. Arrow: p21 + SPC + cells. ( N ) Percentage of p21 + cells in AT2s in the organoid assay. All in vitro experiments have been repeated at least one time with consistent results for validation. Each data point represents one mouse [(D), (E), and (G)] of an individual experiment. Data are expressed as Mean ± SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.005, *** P < 0.0005, and **** P < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: For IGF-1 treatment, the confluent fibroblasts were cultured in 0.5% FBS with 1% antibiotic-antimycotic, and recombinant murine IGF1 (catalog no. 250-19; PeproTech) was added at 50 ng/ml.

    Techniques: Expressing, Control, Staining, Activation Assay, Infection, In Vitro, Biomarker Discovery

    ( A ) snRNA-seq analysis of GLI1 , PATCH1 , IGF1 , and ACTA2 expression in ALMFs and DMFs of human BPD. ( B ) H&E images of the lungs of hyperoxia-treated and control mice. ( C ) Quantification of MLI of hyperoxia-treated and control lungs. ( D ) qPCR analysis of Hhip , Gli1 , and Igf1 expression in the lung stromal cells isolated from hyperoxia-treated and control mice. ( E ) IF analysis of SMA in the lungs of hyperoxia-treated and control mice. ( F ) Histology quantification of the number of myofibroblasts of hyperoxia-treated and control mice. ( G ) qPCR analysis of Acta2 expression in the lung stromal cells isolated from hyperoxia-treated and control mice. ( H ) qPCR analysis of Cdkn1a expression in the lung epithelial cells isolated from hyperoxia-treated and control mice. ( I ) IF analysis of p21 and SPC in the lungs of hyperoxia-treated and control mice. Arrow: p21 + SPC + cells. ( J and K ) Quantification of the percentage of p21 + AT2s and number of AT2s in hyperoxia-treated and control mice. Each data point represents one mouse [(C), (D), (F) to (H), (J), and (K)] of an individual experiment. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.005, and **** P < 0.0001.

    Journal: Science Advances

    Article Title: Hedgehog-interacting protein orchestrates alveologenesis and protects against bronchopulmonary dysplasia and emphysema

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adu2958

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) snRNA-seq analysis of GLI1 , PATCH1 , IGF1 , and ACTA2 expression in ALMFs and DMFs of human BPD. ( B ) H&E images of the lungs of hyperoxia-treated and control mice. ( C ) Quantification of MLI of hyperoxia-treated and control lungs. ( D ) qPCR analysis of Hhip , Gli1 , and Igf1 expression in the lung stromal cells isolated from hyperoxia-treated and control mice. ( E ) IF analysis of SMA in the lungs of hyperoxia-treated and control mice. ( F ) Histology quantification of the number of myofibroblasts of hyperoxia-treated and control mice. ( G ) qPCR analysis of Acta2 expression in the lung stromal cells isolated from hyperoxia-treated and control mice. ( H ) qPCR analysis of Cdkn1a expression in the lung epithelial cells isolated from hyperoxia-treated and control mice. ( I ) IF analysis of p21 and SPC in the lungs of hyperoxia-treated and control mice. Arrow: p21 + SPC + cells. ( J and K ) Quantification of the percentage of p21 + AT2s and number of AT2s in hyperoxia-treated and control mice. Each data point represents one mouse [(C), (D), (F) to (H), (J), and (K)] of an individual experiment. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.005, and **** P < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: For IGF-1 treatment, the confluent fibroblasts were cultured in 0.5% FBS with 1% antibiotic-antimycotic, and recombinant murine IGF1 (catalog no. 250-19; PeproTech) was added at 50 ng/ml.

    Techniques: Expressing, Control, Isolation

    ( A ) Design strategy for HHIP-Fc recombinant protein and its analysis by Western blotting. ( B ) qPCR analysis of Gli1 expression in the lung stromal cells isolated from neonatal mice 3 and 5 days after one dose of HHIP or HHIP-Fc treatment. ( C ) H&E images of hyperoxia-exposed lungs, treated with HHIP-Fc or Fc fragment control. ( D ) MLI quantification of hyperoxia-exposed lungs, treated with HHIP-Fc or Fc. ( E and F ) IF analysis and quantification of myofibroblasts in hyperoxia-exposed lungs, treated with HHIP-Fc or Fc. ( G to I ) IF analysis and quantification of AT2 number and p21 + AT2 percentage in hyperoxia-exposed lungs, treated with HHIP-Fc or Fc. Arrow: p21 + SPC + cells. ( J ) qPCR analysis of Igf1 expression in the lung stromal cells isolated from hyperoxia-exposed mice, treated with HHIP-Fc or Fc. Each data point represents one mouse [(B), (D), (F), and (H) to (J)] of an individual experiment. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.005, *** P < 0.0005, and **** P < 0.0001.

    Journal: Science Advances

    Article Title: Hedgehog-interacting protein orchestrates alveologenesis and protects against bronchopulmonary dysplasia and emphysema

    doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adu2958

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Design strategy for HHIP-Fc recombinant protein and its analysis by Western blotting. ( B ) qPCR analysis of Gli1 expression in the lung stromal cells isolated from neonatal mice 3 and 5 days after one dose of HHIP or HHIP-Fc treatment. ( C ) H&E images of hyperoxia-exposed lungs, treated with HHIP-Fc or Fc fragment control. ( D ) MLI quantification of hyperoxia-exposed lungs, treated with HHIP-Fc or Fc. ( E and F ) IF analysis and quantification of myofibroblasts in hyperoxia-exposed lungs, treated with HHIP-Fc or Fc. ( G to I ) IF analysis and quantification of AT2 number and p21 + AT2 percentage in hyperoxia-exposed lungs, treated with HHIP-Fc or Fc. Arrow: p21 + SPC + cells. ( J ) qPCR analysis of Igf1 expression in the lung stromal cells isolated from hyperoxia-exposed mice, treated with HHIP-Fc or Fc. Each data point represents one mouse [(B), (D), (F), and (H) to (J)] of an individual experiment. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.005, *** P < 0.0005, and **** P < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: For IGF-1 treatment, the confluent fibroblasts were cultured in 0.5% FBS with 1% antibiotic-antimycotic, and recombinant murine IGF1 (catalog no. 250-19; PeproTech) was added at 50 ng/ml.

    Techniques: Recombinant, Western Blot, Expressing, Isolation, Control

    FT stromal cells serve as a niche for FTE cells (A) Representative pictures from organoid culture of sorted Lin − CD24 + cells (4,000, enriched with FTE cells), or Lin − CD24 − cells (5,000, enriched with FT stromal cells), or Lin − CD24 + cells (4,000) plus Lin − CD24 − cells (5,000) (co-culture), scale bar = 100 μm. (B) Quantification of sizes of organoids for (A); ∗∗∗∗: p ≤ 0.0001. (C) Quantification of numbers of organoids (at different size ranges) formed from different cultures as in (A). Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent experiments; ∗∗: p ≤ 0.01, ∗: p ≤ 0.05, ns: not significant. (D) Representative pictures from organoid culture of sorted Lin − CD24 + cells (4,000) in the BT medium in the absence (control) or presence of IGF1, scale bar = 100 μm. (E) Quantification of sizes of organoids for (D); ∗∗∗∗: p ≤ 0.0001. (F) Representative pictures from organoid co-culture in the presence (or absence, or DMSO vehicle control) of different concentrations of the IGF1R inhibitor, PPP, scale bar = 100 μm. (G) Quantification of sizes of organoids for (F); ∗∗: p ≤ 0.01, ∗: p ≤ 0.05, ns: not significant. (H and I) Quantification of sizes and numbers of organoids at different passages of the long-term culture, started from either established organoids (i.e., established via serial passages in the BET medium) (H) or P0 organoid co-culture (i.e., FTE cells + stromal cells from fresh FT tissues) (I), under either the BET, or BT, or BT + IGF1 medium. During each passage, organoids in the BET or BT + IGF1 medium were split at a 1:2 ratio; under the BT medium, because of the small cell number, all recovered single cells were passaged to the next round (1:1). Organoid cells were allowed to grow for 7 days and were then passaged. ∗∗∗: p ≤ 0.001, ∗: p ≤ 0.05, ns: not significant. See also <xref ref-type=Figure S5 . " width="100%" height="100%">

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: Distinct niche structures and intrinsic programs of fallopian tube and ovarian surface epithelial cells

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105861

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FT stromal cells serve as a niche for FTE cells (A) Representative pictures from organoid culture of sorted Lin − CD24 + cells (4,000, enriched with FTE cells), or Lin − CD24 − cells (5,000, enriched with FT stromal cells), or Lin − CD24 + cells (4,000) plus Lin − CD24 − cells (5,000) (co-culture), scale bar = 100 μm. (B) Quantification of sizes of organoids for (A); ∗∗∗∗: p ≤ 0.0001. (C) Quantification of numbers of organoids (at different size ranges) formed from different cultures as in (A). Data are represented as mean ± SEM from three independent experiments; ∗∗: p ≤ 0.01, ∗: p ≤ 0.05, ns: not significant. (D) Representative pictures from organoid culture of sorted Lin − CD24 + cells (4,000) in the BT medium in the absence (control) or presence of IGF1, scale bar = 100 μm. (E) Quantification of sizes of organoids for (D); ∗∗∗∗: p ≤ 0.0001. (F) Representative pictures from organoid co-culture in the presence (or absence, or DMSO vehicle control) of different concentrations of the IGF1R inhibitor, PPP, scale bar = 100 μm. (G) Quantification of sizes of organoids for (F); ∗∗: p ≤ 0.01, ∗: p ≤ 0.05, ns: not significant. (H and I) Quantification of sizes and numbers of organoids at different passages of the long-term culture, started from either established organoids (i.e., established via serial passages in the BET medium) (H) or P0 organoid co-culture (i.e., FTE cells + stromal cells from fresh FT tissues) (I), under either the BET, or BT, or BT + IGF1 medium. During each passage, organoids in the BET or BT + IGF1 medium were split at a 1:2 ratio; under the BT medium, because of the small cell number, all recovered single cells were passaged to the next round (1:1). Organoid cells were allowed to grow for 7 days and were then passaged. ∗∗∗: p ≤ 0.001, ∗: p ≤ 0.05, ns: not significant. See also Figure S5 .

    Article Snippet: Murine IGF1 , PeproTech , 250–19.

    Techniques: Co-Culture Assay, Control

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: Distinct niche structures and intrinsic programs of fallopian tube and ovarian surface epithelial cells

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105861

    Figure Lengend Snippet:

    Article Snippet: Murine IGF1 , PeproTech , 250–19.

    Techniques: Recombinant, cDNA Synthesis, SYBR Green Assay, Immunodetection, Plasmid Preparation, Software