murine igf1 (MedChemExpress)
Structured Review

Murine Igf1, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 14 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/murine igf1/product/MedChemExpress
Average 93 stars, based on 14 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "EGFR marks a subpopulation of dermal mesenchymal cells highly expressing IGF1 which enhances hair follicle regeneration"
Article Title: EGFR marks a subpopulation of dermal mesenchymal cells highly expressing IGF1 which enhances hair follicle regeneration
Journal: Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
doi: 10.1111/jcmm.17766
Figure Legend Snippet: Analysis of scRNA‐seq data to identify dermal mesenchymal cell population that co‐expresses Egfr and Igf1 in neonatal murine skin. (A) UMAP visualisation of all cell populations in 2‐day‐old neonatal mouse skin. Each point represents a single cell, colour‐coded based on cell types. (B) Subset and clustering of dermal cells. (C) Visualisation of dermal and epithelial marker gene expression across dermal subtypes shown in the dot plot. (D) Vlnplot showing Egfr and Igf1 expression in dermal subclusters. (E) Heatmap of top 50 differently expressed genes in EGFR − cells, EGFR + cells and dermal papilla (DP) cells. (F) The GO terms of the BP, CC, and MF categories enrichment of the upregulated genes in EGFR + cells. Within Cartesian coordinates (x,y), the closer the different circles are, the more related the GO terms are. The size of the circle is proportional to the number of genes within the GO terms. The colour of the circle indicates the significance enrichment. BP, biological process; CC, cellular component; GO, Gene Ontology; MF, molecular function.
Techniques Used: Marker, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: Isolation of EGFR expressing mesenchymal cells present in neonatal murine dermis. (A) Immunofluorescence staining for EGFR in tetracycline‐induced neonatal skin from Krt14‐rtTA‐H2BGFP. Scale bar: 50 μm. White arrows point to EGFR positive non‐epithelial cells. (B) Schematic illustration of our strategy for analysing and sorting of EGFR‐expressing mesenchymal cells in neonatal dermis. (C) Fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS) of EGFR+ cells in compo‐site‐FITC negative cells. APC, allophycocyanin; GFP, green fluorescent protein. (D) Real‐Time PCR analysis of mesenchymal marker (Col1a1) expression in freshly isolated mouse dermal subpopulations (Data represents mean ± SEM, n = 3). (E) Immunofluorescence staining of EGFR, vimentin (VIM), DAPI. Scale bar, 100 μm. (F) Real‐time PCR analysis of Igf1 expression in the freshly isolated mouse dermal subpopulations. In Real‐time PCR experiments (D and F), we used triple wells for each sample. Samples from two independent experiments were examined and showed similar results. Results of one analysis are shown. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; EGFR‐ and EGFR+, represent EGFR negative and positive cells; Epi, epidermal cells; ns, means no significant difference.
Techniques Used: Isolation, Expressing, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Fluorescence, FACS, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Marker
Figure Legend Snippet: EGFR and IGF1 expression in adult murine dermis. (A) Immunofluorescence staining for EGFR and DAPI in skin tissues of 7‐week‐old PDGFRa cre ERT;mTmG mice . Scale bar, 100 μm. (B) Immunofluorescence staining of EGFR in tetracycline‐induced Krt14‐rtTA‐H2BGFP adult mouse skin. White arrows point to EGFR positive non‐epithelial cells. Scale bars, 100 μm (C) Immunofluorescence staining of IGF1 in Day 7 wounds. Scale bars, 200 μm. (D) Co‐localisation of IGF1 and EGFR in adult wound dermis. White arrows point to EGFR positive cells. Scale bars, 100 μm.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Immunofluorescence, Staining
Figure Legend Snippet: Effects of IGF1 on wound‐induced hair follicle neogenesis. (A) Schematic representation of strategy for exogenous IGF1 injection during wound healing process. Two full thickness wound (diameter = 2 mm) were made on neonatal mouse dorsal skin. From post‐wounding Day 7 to Day 14, each mouse received a daily injection of 50 μL PBS or murine IGF1 solution (dissolved in PBS at 1 ng/μl) beneath the scab into the wound bed tissue in the two dorsal wounds, respectively. (B) AP staining on wound tissue from control group (PBS) and IGF1 injection group collected at post wound Day 15. The wound bed lies between red dash lines in each picture. AP was stained blue. Red arrows point to AP positive area including neogenic hair follicles. Scale bar, 200 μm. (C) Visualisation of hair follicles in healed wounds collected at Day 21. (D) Statistics of hair follicles in both groups collected at Day 21. Data represents the mean ± SEM, n = 4, * p < 0.05.
Techniques Used: Injection, Staining, Control
![( A ) IF analysis of SMA in the alveoli of Hhip -deleted (HHIP CKO) and control mice at P14. ( B ) Number of myofibroblasts per unit alveolar area of Hhip -deleted and control mice. ( C and D ) UMAP showing cell clusters in the lung fibroblasts of Hhip -deleted and control mice at P14. ( E ) Violin plots showing the expression of Pdgfra , Acta2 , Hhip , and Cdh4 in alveolar myofibroblasts (ALMF), ductal myofibroblasts (DMF), peribronchial fibroblasts (Perib), adventitial fibroblasts (Adv), and alveolar fibroblasts (Alv). ( F ) Expression of Acta2 , Myh11 , Tagln , and <t>Igf1</t> in ALMFs and DMFs of Hhip -deleted and control mice. ( G ) qPCR analysis of Igf1 expression in the lung stromal cells isolated from Hhip -deleted and control mice. ( H ) Analysis of Igf1 (RNA in situ ) and SMA expression in the alveoli. ( I ) Number of SMA + Igf1 + cells per unit alveolar area of Hhip -deleted and control mice at P14. ( J ) Percentage of SMA + Igf1 + cells in total Igf1 + cells. ( K ) Top 10 activated pathways in Hhip -deleted, relative to control myofibroblasts, analyzed with IPA. ( L ) qPCR analysis of Gli1 , Igf1 , and Acta2 expression in the lung stromal cells treated with PBS, SHH, and SHH plus HHIP. ( M ) qPCR analysis of Acta2 expression in SHH-stimulated lung stromal cells treated with vehicle or IGF1R inhibitor. ( N ) IF analysis of SMA expression in the alveoli of Hhip -deleted mice administered with vehicle or IGF1R inhibitor. ( O ) Number of myofibroblasts per unit alveolar area of Hhip -deleted mice administered with vehicle or IGF1R inhibitor. All in vitro experiments have been repeated at least one time with consistent results for validation. Each data point represents one mouse [(B), (G), (I), (J), and (O)] of an individual experiment. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.005, *** P < 0.0005, and **** P < 0.0001.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_7671/pmc12057671/pmc12057671__sciadv.adu2958-f2.jpg)
Figure S5 . " width="250" height="auto" />